


Kuryakyn Cylinder Base Cover 07-16 Touring & Dyna Models Chrome
Marsoni
M251S
Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping.
Friday, May 29
Kuryakyn Cylinder Base Cover 07-16 Touring & Dyna Models ChromeSmooths the transition between the cylinders and the engine cases and covers the entire gap between the cylinder base and the inner primary. This Part Fits: Year Make Model Submodel 2007 2016 Harley Davidson FLHR Road King Base 2007 2016 Harley Davidson FLHRC Road King Classic Base 2007 Harley Davidson FLHRS Road King Custom Base 2007 2009 Harley Davidson FLHT Electra Glide Standard Base 2007 2013 Harley Davidson FLHTC Electra Glide Classic Base 2007
Quick Dispatch:
Your Kuryakyn Cylinder Base Cover 07-16 Touring & Dyna Models Chrome orders ship within 1-2 business days.
Delivery Options:
- Standard: 3-7 business days
- Fast: 2-3 business days
- Express: 1-2 business days
Order Tracking:
You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Kuryakyn Cylinder Base Cover 07-16 Touring & Dyna Models Chrome ships.
Need Help?
Questions about Kuryakyn Cylinder Base Cover 07-16 Touring & Dyna Models Chrome, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.
Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Kuryakyn Cylinder Base Cover 07-16 Touring & Dyna Models Chrome in your area.
Get Shipping Estimates
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
You may also like
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 1751 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 1
Kia CarnivalSXP 2024
Color: for Kia Carnival 2022-2024
What am I missing?? This does not fit into the vent in my new Carnival. Returning.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 26, 2024
★★★★★ 5
Good
Color: for Kia Carnival 2022-2024
Like the quality and it fit well
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 26, 2024
★★★★★ 5
Works well, looks stupid with the logo display
This fits well in the vent frame and I am still able to close my vent. I really like the mount cause it solves a huge problem of where to put my phone securely... but I also hate it as well, because of the ugly logo on the face of it. "Batdiary"? Seriously? If I keep it I will look for a way to get rid of (or cover up) the extremely unattractive logo they selected. It makes it (and my trucks interior) look loke something for a child. I give it 5 stars because it deserves better than the 3.9 it had at the time of posting this. But for the love of everything clean and classy but still needing a mount, get rid of the bat logo!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2026
★★★★★ 4
No cheap plastic
Holds good
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 24, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Good, but minor issues
The build quality seemed impressive and it felt sturdy. When installed, it definitely stayed in the air vent without wiggling or coming loose after quite a bit of off roading and driving over washboards.
I returned this thing and bought the "off roam" competitor because of two reasons:
1) the ball joints don't tighten down hard enough to lock the position of the mount firmly. It grips well when you don't touch it, but if you are trying to put the phone into the mount without both hands, it shifts and moves with minimal pressure. Kind of annoying for me, I feel the ball joints should tighten enough not to budge if given a tiny bit of force or accidental bump.
2) the inner springs of the phone holder started loosening and making an obnoxious vibrating/rattling sound after about a month. Any bump or minor rough surface caused this thing to rattle like loose change in a cup holder IF THE PHONE WASNT IN IT. If the phone was in the holder it didn't do this at all. It started to drive me crazy.
If you can get past these two things it's built well enough and works perfectly fine. I just expect a bit more for $50-$60.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 1, 2025