Mahle Rings Jeep 4.0L 242 L6 Eng 1996-2002 Dodge Trk 4.0L 242 L6 Eng Plain Ring Set

Mahle Rings Jeep 4.0L 242 L6 Eng 1996-2002 Dodge Trk 4.0L 242 L6 Eng Plain Ring Set

Marsoni

M251S

$129.90

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Mahle Rings Jeep 4.0L 242 L6 Eng 1996-2002 Dodge Trk 4.0L 242 L6 Eng Plain Ring SetMAHLE(R) piston rings are the most technically advanced piston rings in the industry. Driven by OE requirements; reducing friction and ring mass while minimizing engine oil consumption, and providing longer service life. MAHLE piston rings lead the industry for the latest piston ring technology. This Part Fits: Year Make Model Submodel 1996,1998 2001 Jeep Cherokee Classic 1996 1997 Jeep Cherokee Country 1998 2001 Jeep Cherokee Limited 1996 2001 Jeep

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Mahle Rings Jeep 4.0L 242 L6 Eng 1996-2002 Dodge Trk 4.0L 242 L6 Eng Plain Ring Set orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Mahle Rings Jeep 4.0L 242 L6 Eng 1996-2002 Dodge Trk 4.0L 242 L6 Eng Plain Ring Set ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Mahle Rings Jeep 4.0L 242 L6 Eng 1996-2002 Dodge Trk 4.0L 242 L6 Eng Plain Ring Set, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Mahle Rings Jeep 4.0L 242 L6 Eng 1996-2002 Dodge Trk 4.0L 242 L6 Eng Plain Ring Set in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

I have so many gadgets that uses remotes, my end table looked awful with remotes everywhere and when I would move something, a remote would fall off the table. It was aggravating but now I have a nice caddy to sit on my table and it holds all of my remotes. It's beautifully designed and was shipped to me very quickly. I think it was in my mailbox within 24 hours. I'm very pleased with the item and the person I purchased it from was quick to get it to me. Thank you.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2026

Verified Purchase

Amazon2000

Waukegan, US

★★★★★ 4

Sleek and spacious

Color: Black, Size: Small

Perfect for those who have multiple remotes and need a single place to stow them away. Material is leather like, firm and has a texture design. It suits well on a countertop or end table. It is not petite.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 2, 2026

Verified Purchase

JCKlu

West Palm Beach, US

★★★★★ 5

Great product

Color: Black, Size: Small

This is great to store multiple remotes in a small footprint clearing up table room. My 6 year old Grandson loves it also keeping remotes in one area. He operates the TV also. We loved it so much we bought a second for another room.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2026

Verified Purchase

Kyle

Dallas, US

★★★★★ 5

Perfect for me.

Color: Black, Size: Small

I was a little trepidatious before opening it all up and checking out the holder. I didn't know whether or not the larger remotes I had would fit. How would it work for the bulky / longer TV and Universal Remotes. It worked perfectly. The holder is small enough to use on a small side table next to the couch. And it's very simple to access. The living room now looks like a living room...rather than Radio Shack gone biserk.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 21, 2026

Verified Purchase

KimberlyK

Lake Worth, US

★★★★★ 5

Very good quality.

Color: Black, Size: Small

So nice to have for keeping my stuff organized. Easier to keep track of my remotes.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 29, 2026