Potter on America by Stephen Potter - Rupert Hart Davis 1956, First Edition

Potter on America by Stephen Potter - Rupert Hart Davis 1956, First Edition

Marsoni

M251S

$24.49

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Potter on America by Stephen Potter - Rupert Hart Davis 1956, First EditionTitle: Potter on America Author: Stephen Potter Publisher: Rupert Hart Davis Publication Date: 1956, First Edition Format: Hardcover with dust jacket Condition: This book is in good condition for its age. The dust jacket is faded and torn There is a small inscription on the pastedown. Reader's note Give the gift of knowledge to your loved ones today and watch their eyes light up as they explore the rich tapestry of a vintage book! Each one is a

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Potter on America by Stephen Potter - Rupert Hart Davis 1956, First Edition orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Potter on America by Stephen Potter - Rupert Hart Davis 1956, First Edition ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Potter on America by Stephen Potter - Rupert Hart Davis 1956, First Edition, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Potter on America by Stephen Potter - Rupert Hart Davis 1956, First Edition in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

If these pants are the right look for what you want/need, they're a reasonably good quality option. But that said, in practice these looked a little "cheesy" with the black stripe. I can't say for sure that's a result of how the product is made/how it looks, but I just couldn't see myself wearing them. That's assuming I could wear them... In terms of fit, they were slightly small in the waist for both pairs I ordered. I'm not sure what I thought they meant when I read that they were unhemmed, but for those looking for pants to take out of the box and wear... these aren't for you. The ankles are not "finished" and require hemming to make them look acceptable. (This was my fault, so I didn't count off for this)

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on July 8, 2021

Verified Purchase

Chiaro

Waukegan, US

★★★★★ 3

They stand out, and are flashy, but sizing is complicated.

Size: 34, Color: Black With White Strip, Size: 34, Color: Black With White Strip

High-quality pants and flashy. The stripe adds a lot of attention for reasons both good and bad. The materials they were made are excellent quality. Pants are thick, but not too thick, and are lightweight, guaranteeing easy movement. Comfortable - could wear these all day. I do love their appearance. They made me feel like a million bucks. :) The only problem is sizing and fit. I normally wear size 34 for waist in jeans and dress pants like these, but the 34 I got didn't fit at all - too tight. So, I ordered a 36, and it fit, but barely. When I sat down, there was too much tightness in my "masculine area". I also ordered a 38, and, well, they were just too big - practically hung off me. A 37 would probably work for me in these, but they don't offer such a size. I have to return the 34 and 38. Will keep the 36, see if I can have it altered in some way. Length was fine. Being 1.86 meters, often the length in these pants is a little on the short side. In the photo, I'm wearing size 36 and the black pair with the gold stripe, which is actually more of a flashy yellow. I liked how I looked in them, but they were a little too tight at times, the belt wasn't even necessary. It enhanced the outfit though, don't you think.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on July 20, 2025